LactisCut is a Jeju-cabbage-derived probiotic; the live Lactococcus lactis strain is shown by SEM.
LactisCut is a body-fat-reduction probiotic derived from Jeju cabbage. The strain is an individually-approved (IRDI) functional ingredient, clinically shown to reduce body fat mass by about 0.87 kg over twelve weeks of intake.
Ingredient specification
- Brand nameLactisCut®
- Ingredient nameGlucose, Lactobacillus lactis subsp. lactis CAB701
- Manufacturing methodFermentation, then freeze-drying
- Marker compoundProbiotics, 10 to 100 billion CFU
- Recommended intake10 to 100 billion CFU per day, as probiotics
- OriginJeju, Korea
What LactisCut does
- Body fat reduction
- Immune activation
- Antioxidant
- Gut health
The marker compound is probiotics at 10 to 100 billion CFU. The principal claim is body fat reduction, supported by mechanism work at the cellular and animal level and confirmed in a human clinical trial.
Clinical results
The trial was conducted at Pusan National University Hospital, Yangsan. Across twelve weeks, subjects showed a significant reduction in body fat mass of approximately 0.87 kg, with safety confirmed throughout long-term consumption.
| Stage | Analysis item | Result | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| In‑vitro (cellular) | Adipocyte differentiation inhibition | 67.0% inhibition | Significant |
| In‑vivo (animal) | Adipocyte size | 22.4% reduction | Significant |
| Human clinical trial | Body fat mass reduction | 0.87 kg reduction | p < 0.001 |
| Cell test | Intestinal epithelial cell adherence | 75.2% adherence | Superior |
Note: results may vary by individual.
Patent & journals
- Patent
KR 10-2023-0146232 - JournalProbiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Jun;17(3):1203–1216.
- JournalMicroorganisms. 2023 Jun 30;11(7):1718. — LactisCut: a weight-loss probiotic derived from Jeju cabbage.
A note on nomenclature. BK bio documents this strain as Lactobacillus lactis subsp. lactis CAB701, and that name is used throughout this page. Some supporting figures label the organism within the Lactobacillus group; the two genus names are not interchangeable. We retain the manufacturer's stated classification and flag the discrepancy for formulators who require an exact taxonomic record.